HP- and non-HP modules should not be mixed in a TinyMesh network, cause the mesh-forming will be “wrong” (its a bit complex explanation to this)
Last Update: November 8, 2017
November 8, 2017 1879 Tinymesh Q&A
Related Knowledge Base Posts -
- [TINYMESH] “We want a RC1740TM-DK but I doesn’t found this article in your price list. On your web side stand >>> contact Radiocrafts” – what does this imply? “
- [TINYMESH] “We have a doubt about the connections dynamic and network architecture. Consider the image below: 1 – Gateway, Router and End device ar configured with the same RF Power 2 – Gateway signal can reach directly to End Device 3 – Router can reach to Gateway and End Device 4 – The End Device only can reach the Router when transmitting, but receive the signal from Gateway directly Although the end device can receive the signal from the Gateway (above RSSI acceptance level), once the End Device can’t reach the Gateway directly, the connection is never established and the second way through Router is never choosed. The tiny mesh algorithm favors the shortly way to gateway if the rssi level is above acceptance level. If the end device receive the signal from Gateway above acceptance level, but is not able to reach the gateway directly, even if we have a router between Gateway and End Device the connection is never establish. Do you have any explanation to this behavior and a way to improve and avoid this kind of scenario? “
- [TINYMESH] I have a query regarding the tiny mesh 868MHz module. Due to the restricted dimensions of the enclosure we would like to use the radiocrafts module in, is it possible to orientate the antennas of the gateway and routers in the network horizontally? Ideally to minimize system cost, would having a length of wire (at the 1/4 wavelength of 868MHz) soldered to the RF o/p of the module which would be perpendicular to the PCB give good range?